# Superluminal vs RebusFarm

> RebusFarm rendered all four scenes. Only 6 of 50 Fox (EEVEE) frames reached local disk, but download does not enter its exact render-pipeline score.

- Canonical HTML: https://superlumin.al/compare/superluminal-vs-rebusfarm
- Markdown endpoint: https://superlumin.al/compare/superluminal-vs-rebusfarm.md
- Structured page data: https://superlumin.al/compare/superluminal-vs-rebusfarm.json
- Published: 2026-08-04
- Last updated: 2026-08-07
- Author: Superluminal Engineering

## Quick answer

RebusFarm used two tiers and RenderPoints. The comparison covers render-pipeline times, converted prices, upload, and delivery.

## Data access

- [This page as structured JSON](https://superlumin.al/compare/superluminal-vs-rebusfarm.json)

- Every chart below includes a full-resolution PNG and its underlying values as a Markdown table.

- Every screenshot below is embedded with its alt text, caption, and full-resolution URL.

## Related documentation

- [Troubleshoot the Blender add-on](https://superlumin.al/docs/blender-addon/troubleshooting): Diagnose connection, project, submission, dependency, render, and download problems without exposing credentials.

## Complete report

Every tested scene reached local disk sooner with Superluminal. Its exact dollar charge was also lower than RebusFarm's dated dollar estimate in every scene.

![Superluminal and RebusFarm selected on the 2026 render farm score scatterplot](https://superlumin.al/seo/charts/superluminal-vs-rebusfarm-ranking-2026.png "Superluminal and RebusFarm in the benchmark ranking")

*[Open the full-resolution PNG](https://superlumin.al/seo/charts/superluminal-vs-rebusfarm-ranking-2026.png).*

#### Underlying data: Superluminal and RebusFarm in the benchmark ranking

Scores are frozen against the 2026 benchmark. 100 is the reference on both axes.

| Initial state | Rank | Render farm | Time Score | Price Score | Combined score | Coverage |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| selected | 1 | Superluminal | 179.1 | 187.8 | 182.0 | all 4 scenes |
| muted | 2 | GarageFarm | 138.2 | 102.2 | 126.2 | all 4 scenes |
| muted | 3 | RenderJuice | 93.7 | 176.2 | 121.2 | all 4 scenes |
| selected | 4 | RebusFarm | 102.0 | 59.9 | 88.0 | all 4 scenes |
| muted | 5 | RenderStreet | 68.8 | 121.7 | 86.5 | all 4 scenes |
| muted | 6 | Fox Renderfarm | 67.5 | 115.3 | 83.5 | all 4 scenes |
| muted | 7 | iRender | 51.4 | 66.4 | 56.4 | all 4 scenes |
| muted | 8 | Render Network | 49.7 | 37.7 | 45.7 | 1 of 4 scenes with both metrics; no coverage penalty |
| muted | 9 | Blendergrid | 22.9 | 80.6 | 42.1 | 3 of 4 scenes with both metrics; no coverage penalty |

[Open the complete benchmark dataset](https://superlumin.al/seo/evidence/render-farm-benchmarks-2026-08.json)

RebusFarm ranked fourth overall at 88.0. Its Time Score was 102.0, and its Price Score was 59.9. Only [6 of 50 Fox (EEVEE) frames](/seo/evidence/runs/rebusfarm-standard-cpu-fox-eevee-2026-08-02.json) reached local disk, but its completed render pipeline is exact. Download does not enter the [benchmark score](/compare/blender-render-farms).

## Tiers and results

RebusFarm's Standard GPU tier did not start Classroom. We used Priority+3 for Classroom and Junk Shop, then Standard for Monster and Fox (EEVEE).

| Scene | Fastest Superluminal render pipeline | RebusFarm render pipeline | Exact RebusFarm charge | Dollar estimate |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| ![](/seo/benchmarks/thumb-classroom.jpg) Classroom | 90.5 s | 445.5 s | 9.741829 RP | $11.45 |
| ![](/seo/benchmarks/thumb-junkshop.jpg) Junk Shop | 64.5 s | 315.5 s | 8.799330 RP | $10.34 |
| ![](/seo/benchmarks/thumb-monster.jpg) Monster Under the Bed | 59.9 s | 101.1 s | 3.089073 RP | $3.63 |
| ![](/seo/benchmarks/thumb-fox.jpg) Fox (EEVEE) | 66.5 s, 10 nodes | 168.4 s | 12.917942 RP | $15.18 |

![Superluminal submission terminal confirming the queued job after packaging and upload](https://superlumin.al/seo/interfaces/superluminal-submission-terminal.png)

*Submission ends in the add-on's terminal: the job is packaged, uploaded, and queued before any browser opens.*

![Superluminal Classroom job starting active rendering on 30 nodes](https://superlumin.al/seo/interfaces/superluminal-live-progress-classroom.webp)

*Active rendering started after the upload and queue phases in the same recording.*

![Superluminal Classroom job after all 145 frames completed](https://superlumin.al/seo/interfaces/superluminal-completed-classroom.webp)

*Provider completion showed all 145 Classroom frames finished.*

![Superluminal Classroom job after all 145 frames reached local disk](https://superlumin.al/seo/interfaces/superluminal-downloaded-classroom.webp)

*The final boundary confirms the complete local frame set 106.7 seconds after upload began.*

![RebusFarm ControlCenter with the Classroom project ready to render](https://superlumin.al/seo/interfaces/rebusfarm-upload-ready.webp)

*After upload, ControlCenter lists Classroom as Ready to Render and requires a separate Render action.*

![RebusFarm Classroom job showing active nodes](https://superlumin.al/seo/interfaces/rebusfarm-active-nodes-classroom.webp)

*ControlCenter shows active capacity and progress.*

![RebusFarm ControlCenter list with three completed benchmark jobs](https://superlumin.al/seo/interfaces/rebusfarm-completed-costs.webp)

*The job list shows Classroom at 145 of 145 frames and 9.74 RenderPoints.*

![RebusFarm Classroom at 145 of 145 frames at the verified local-completion boundary](https://superlumin.al/seo/interfaces/rebusfarm-classroom-local-completion-boundary.webp)

*At the logged local-completion boundary, ControlCenter showed 145 of 145 frames and 100 percent.*

## Rates, upload, and local delivery

Each tested tier showed two rates. The checkout rate was about 17 percent higher than the configured rate in every recorded case.

Priority+3 showed 0.969 cents per OctaneBench-hour at checkout and 0.825 cents in configuration. For Monster, Standard showed 0.529 and 0.450 cents.

Superluminal has one rate, and it is the one you are charged. The capacity control shows dollars per GPU-hour for the node count you pick, and the job's final charge reconciles against exactly that number.

The dollar estimates use a dated purchase of 15 RP for $17.63. The desktop client uploaded at 2.1 MB/s, the slowest measured rate in the test. Its interface showed a peak of 18 active nodes.

Running a job means two surfaces: the desktop app submits, and a separate web manager monitors. The prepaid balance also ran out in the middle of the Junk Shop render, so we bought more RenderPoints while the farm kept working ([Junk Shop record](/seo/evidence/runs/rebusfarm-priority-plus-3-junkshop-2026-08-02.json)).

For the three complete local deliveries, the last file arrived 2.2 to 47.1 seconds after RebusFarm reported completion.

## The download that paused itself

RebusDrop, the retrieval helper, is where the Fox (EEVEE) job went wrong. It showed a connection warning and paused before the farm had even finished computing. Restarting it paused again immediately, and the job page kept showing a stale cost while the balance had already moved.

The farm side completed all 50 frames. Our disk had six when the recording ended. Download sits outside the score, so RebusFarm keeps its exact Time Score, but a render you cannot retrieve is not a render you can deliver.

Superluminal treats delivery as part of the render. The add-on [streams each finished frame to disk](/live-previews) while later frames render, and an interrupted transfer resumes. The charge for each finished frame appears on the job page as it lands, in dollars, with no point conversion to track.

## Sources

| # | Source | Type | Checked | URL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Render farm benchmark dataset, July to August 2026 | First-party benchmark evidence | 2026-08-04 | https://superlumin.al/seo/evidence/render-farm-benchmarks-2026-08.json |